Post by rubina9898 on Dec 24, 2023 7:47:11 GMT
Loading photos. Interestingly the authors of the new Wykop boast about redesigning the application architecture to make it more efficient In the new architecture Wykop has become a much more efficient service which translates into its speed and stability in situations of increased traffic. I wonder what much greater efficiency means for authors What testing methodology did they use and what results did they obtain It's a pity that no data on this subject was made available because in my subjective opinion the website's efficiency actually decreased.
I haven't done any research on this I'm just talking about my experience after using the app for a few hours. Knowing the capabilities and resource requirements of the application would not Phone Number List only allow for more effective scaling depending on needs but also potentially optimize costs. Compatibility Since I both produce software and use software developed by others I realize how important service compatibility is . A special case is backward compatibility i.e. a situation when we replace an old solution with a new one. Unfortunately Wykop's programmers completely ignored this aspect.
The first symptom is a broken iOS app . According to assurances the Android application works but unfortunately I cannot personally verify it. Even though a PWA application was created I still think I was treated like a second class user. The second key problem is killing the old API version . The V version was killed practically overnight. The authors of applications using the Wykop API did not receive any information. An example of what this approach can lead to is the entry of the user who was put in such a situation for the second time.
I haven't done any research on this I'm just talking about my experience after using the app for a few hours. Knowing the capabilities and resource requirements of the application would not Phone Number List only allow for more effective scaling depending on needs but also potentially optimize costs. Compatibility Since I both produce software and use software developed by others I realize how important service compatibility is . A special case is backward compatibility i.e. a situation when we replace an old solution with a new one. Unfortunately Wykop's programmers completely ignored this aspect.
The first symptom is a broken iOS app . According to assurances the Android application works but unfortunately I cannot personally verify it. Even though a PWA application was created I still think I was treated like a second class user. The second key problem is killing the old API version . The V version was killed practically overnight. The authors of applications using the Wykop API did not receive any information. An example of what this approach can lead to is the entry of the user who was put in such a situation for the second time.